History Optional Explained by Abhas Verma UPSC 2025 Mains Paper 2 -Part 2
Q.2(a) Do you agree that the idea of Permanent Fixation
of Land Revenue of 1793 in Bengal was highly influenced by the Physiocratic
school of thinking? Discuss. (20 Marks)
Introduction
The Permanent Settlement of 1793, introduced by Lord
Cornwallis in Bengal, fixed land revenue permanently and recognized zamindars
as proprietors of land. It was significantly influenced by the Physiocratic
School of 18th-century France, which regarded agriculture as the primary source
of wealth and emphasized secure property rights.
Influence of Physiocratic Thought on Permanent Settlement
1. Land as the Source of Wealth
- Physiocrats
believed that agriculture alone generated surplus wealth.
- The
British viewed land revenue as the principal source of state income.
- Agricultural
prosperity was expected to ensure stable revenues.
2. Security of Property Rights
- Physiocrats
advocated private ownership of land.
- Zamindars
were granted hereditary proprietary rights.
- Secure
ownership was expected to encourage investment in agricultural
improvement.
3. Permanent Revenue Demand
- Land
revenue was fixed permanently.
- It
was believed that certainty would stimulate productivity and agricultural
expansion.
- Increased
agricultural output would benefit zamindars without additional government
demands.
4. Principle of Laissez-faire
- The
state minimized direct intervention in agrarian management.
- The
policy reflected the Physiocratic belief that economic growth would occur
through the operation of self-interest.
Other Factors Behind the Settlement
Revenue Stability
- The
East India Company sought a predictable and regular source of income.
- Administrative
convenience was an important consideration.
Creation of a Loyal Landed Class
- The
British intended to create a class of landlords loyal to colonial rule.
- The
model was inspired partly by the English landed aristocracy.
Limited Understanding of Indian Agrarian Structure
- Zamindars
were often revenue collectors rather than true landowners.
- Cultivators
received no ownership rights.
Critical Evaluation
- Agricultural
productivity did not increase substantially.
- Absentee
landlordism expanded.
- Peasant
exploitation intensified.
- The
state lost future revenue gains because assessment remained fixed.
Conclusion
The Permanent Settlement was deeply influenced by
Physiocratic ideas of agricultural primacy, property rights, and revenue
certainty. However, colonial fiscal interests and administrative convenience
were equally important in shaping the policy, which ultimately failed to
achieve the expected agrarian transformation.
Q.2(b) "The tug of war between the two principles of
freedom and control of the press made its influence felt on the colonial
rulers' attitude to the press." Discuss. (20 Marks)
Introduction
British press policy in India was characterized by a
constant struggle between liberal commitments to freedom of expression and the
colonial state's need to maintain political control. As a result, government
policy alternated between encouragement and repression.
Colonial Support for Press Freedom
1. Influence of British Liberalism
- Freedom
of expression was an important aspect of British political tradition.
- The
press was considered a means of public education and political awareness.
2. Metcalfe's Press Reforms (1835)
- Restrictions
on newspapers were significantly reduced.
- Charles
Metcalfe came to be known as the "Liberator of the Indian
Press."
3. Administrative Utility
- Newspapers
helped communicate public grievances.
- They
provided feedback regarding administrative shortcomings.
Colonial Tendency Towards Control
1. Early Press Restrictions
- Wellesley's
Press Regulations (1799) introduced censorship.
- Security
concerns were cited as justification.
2. Rise of Nationalist Press
- Newspapers
increasingly criticized colonial policies.
- Press
became a tool for political mobilization.
3. Vernacular Press Act, 1878
- Targeted
Indian-language newspapers.
- Empowered
authorities to suppress criticism without judicial protection.
4. Press Act, 1910
- Introduced
securities, fines, and confiscations.
- Widely
used against nationalist newspapers.
Role in National Movement
- Newspapers
such as Kesari, Young India, The Hindu, and Amrita Bazar Patrika spread
nationalist consciousness.
- Restrictions
often strengthened public sympathy for the freedom struggle.
Critical Analysis
- Colonial
liberalism was selective and conditional.
- Freedom
was permitted only so long as it did not challenge imperial authority.
- Whenever
nationalism intensified, repression outweighed liberal principles.
Conclusion
The colonial state's attitude towards the press reflected
the contradiction between British liberal values and imperial interests. Though
freedom of expression was occasionally promoted, the need to preserve colonial
authority ultimately ensured that control remained the dominant concern.
Q.2(c) "The movement for linguistic States generated
deep apprehensions among the nationalist elite. They feared it would lead to
the Balkanization of India." Examine. (10 Marks)
Introduction
In the years following Independence, demands for the
reorganization of states on linguistic lines gained momentum. Many nationalist
leaders feared that such demands could weaken national unity and encourage
regional fragmentation.
Reasons for Apprehensions
1. Impact of Partition
- India
had recently experienced the trauma of Partition.
- Leaders
were concerned that linguistic identities might foster separatist
tendencies.
2. Challenge to National Integration
- Strong
linguistic loyalties were feared to overshadow national identity.
- Multiple
statehood demands could potentially fragment the Union.
3. Recommendations of Early Committees
- The
Dhar Commission (1948) opposed linguistic reorganization.
- The
JVP Committee (1949) emphasized national unity over linguistic
considerations.
Factors Leading to Acceptance
Andhra Movement
- Potti
Sriramulu's death intensified public pressure.
- Andhra
State was created in 1953.
States Reorganisation Commission (1953-55)
- Recommended
reorganization largely on linguistic lines.
- Led
to the States Reorganisation Act, 1956.
Did the Fear Materialize?
No, Linguistic States Strengthened Democracy
- Regional
aspirations found constitutional expression.
- Governance
became more accessible through local languages.
- Federalism
and national integration were strengthened rather than weakened.
Conclusion
Although nationalist leaders initially feared linguistic
reorganization would lead to Balkanization, India's experience demonstrated
that accommodation of linguistic identities within a federal framework
strengthened democracy and national unity. Linguistic states emerged as
instruments of integration rather than disintegration.
Comments
Post a Comment